<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Truth About the Firefox &#8220;Pipelining&#8221; Trick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/</link>
	<description>Helping Geeks Make Money Online</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>I just tried this using Google image searches.  Without pipelining, the pages loaded in an average of about 2.75 seconds.  With pipelining, the average was about 2.25 seconds.  Subjectively, the delay before the first image loaded seemed about the same, but the delay between the first image loaded and all images were loaded seemed much shorter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried this using Google image searches.  Without pipelining, the pages loaded in an average of about 2.75 seconds.  With pipelining, the average was about 2.25 seconds.  Subjectively, the delay before the first image loaded seemed about the same, but the delay between the first image loaded and all images were loaded seemed much shorter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egon</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>egon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 00:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>Glad I could help Richard :) I'm all too familiar with the situation you provided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I could help Richard <img src='http://egonitron.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I&#8217;m all too familiar with the situation you provided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bello</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1938</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1938</guid>
		<description>O god... I am so sick of people all over the internet writing articles, and making videos tutorials with incorrect info about the network.http.pipelining.maxrequests hack...

------------------
12 year old who knows nothing about computers writes: "Hey...What if i set it to a high number like 100?

Idiot who copied and pasted the tutorial from another idiot writes: Wow IDK, i should try that, It would be super fast!

12 year old writes back: I am such 1337 hacker.
-------------------

I so happy to finally get this info from someone who knows what they are talking about... Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O god&#8230; I am so sick of people all over the internet writing articles, and making videos tutorials with incorrect info about the network.http.pipelining.maxrequests hack&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
12 year old who knows nothing about computers writes: &#8220;Hey&#8230;What if i set it to a high number like 100?</p>
<p>Idiot who copied and pasted the tutorial from another idiot writes: Wow IDK, i should try that, It would be super fast!</p>
<p>12 year old writes back: I am such 1337 hacker.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I so happy to finally get this info from someone who knows what they are talking about&#8230; Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1930</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1930</guid>
		<description>Wow luckly i read your article because the nglayout.initialpaint.delay that i had set to 0 was slowing down the websites from full load. I booted that and its super fast. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow luckly i read your article because the nglayout.initialpaint.delay that i had set to 0 was slowing down the websites from full load. I booted that and its super fast. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>I don't know what all the hype is about, but I tried FF3 on my computer and it's not as fast as expected. When I recently upgraded Internet Explorer 7 to IE7 PRO (you could call it Internet Explorer 7.5), it now loads pages as fast as FF3, has many of the FF features, and downloads faster. I am now enjoying IE7 PRO better than FF3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what all the hype is about, but I tried FF3 on my computer and it&#8217;s not as fast as expected. When I recently upgraded Internet Explorer 7 to IE7 PRO (you could call it Internet Explorer 7.5), it now loads pages as fast as FF3, has many of the FF features, and downloads faster. I am now enjoying IE7 PRO better than FF3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>I am setting my pipeline value to 60. Will that possibly further enhance the browser speed on Firefox 3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am setting my pipeline value to 60. Will that possibly further enhance the browser speed on Firefox 3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schatten</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>schatten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>Seems a little bit faster. I am using FF 3, didn't notice a great difference yet, but may I will see it soon. Keep on testing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems a little bit faster. I am using FF 3, didn&#8217;t notice a great difference yet, but may I will see it soon. Keep on testing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Morningstarr* - Open firefox faster</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>The Morningstarr* - Open firefox faster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>[...] Open firefox faster     http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-...elining-trick/  better guide    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Open firefox faster     <a href="http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-...elining-trick/" rel="nofollow">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/2.....ing-trick/</a>  better guide    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1902</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1902</guid>
		<description>I enabled pipelining a while back.
Over time I noticed that some graphics sites, with thumbnails, weren't loading properly - - many thumbnails wouldn't load, unless I refreshed a couple of times.
If I switched to IE, everything would load normally.
So, one day the light bulb went off, and I disabled pipelining.  And voila, all thumbnails now load normally.
I've tried adjusting the number, even down to 2, but some thumbnails still wouldn't load.
I don't know why this happens, but now I have pipelining disabled... and all's well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enabled pipelining a while back.<br />
Over time I noticed that some graphics sites, with thumbnails, weren&#8217;t loading properly - - many thumbnails wouldn&#8217;t load, unless I refreshed a couple of times.<br />
If I switched to IE, everything would load normally.<br />
So, one day the light bulb went off, and I disabled pipelining.  And voila, all thumbnails now load normally.<br />
I&#8217;ve tried adjusting the number, even down to 2, but some thumbnails still wouldn&#8217;t load.<br />
I don&#8217;t know why this happens, but now I have pipelining disabled&#8230; and all&#8217;s well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inhahe</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1901</link>
		<dc:creator>inhahe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1901</guid>
		<description>It only improves speed noticeably in certain situations.  If you have to download many small files from a website (and it supports pipelining for that server), it will improve the speed drastically.   After I enabled pipelining loading pages of thumbnails in MySpace or DeviantArt was shockingly faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It only improves speed noticeably in certain situations.  If you have to download many small files from a website (and it supports pipelining for that server), it will improve the speed drastically.   After I enabled pipelining loading pages of thumbnails in MySpace or DeviantArt was shockingly faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egon</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1900</link>
		<dc:creator>egon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1900</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment parviziyi. The problem with Pipelining is that it's so dependent on so many factors, some people see a big difference, and some see nothing.

Personally, the difference I've seen was minimal, but there none-the-less.

Of course, there is also the possibility of the placebo effect on a lot of people as well, and that's fine too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment parviziyi. The problem with Pipelining is that it&#8217;s so dependent on so many factors, some people see a big difference, and some see nothing.</p>
<p>Personally, the difference I&#8217;ve seen was minimal, but there none-the-less.</p>
<p>Of course, there is also the possibility of the placebo effect on a lot of people as well, and that&#8217;s fine too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parviziyi</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator>parviziyi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1899</guid>
		<description>When I enabled pipelining in Firefox there was no perceptable improvement in speed. I think the improvement must be small, if it exists. Anybody claiming to report "The Truth About the Firefox Pipelining Trick" must state how much faster downloads are with the pipelining enabled and this report doesn't do so. For the man to crow "I love this feature, and use it to it's fullest" without quantifying what difference it makes, sounds like snake oil salesmanship to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I enabled pipelining in Firefox there was no perceptable improvement in speed. I think the improvement must be small, if it exists. Anybody claiming to report &#8220;The Truth About the Firefox Pipelining Trick&#8221; must state how much faster downloads are with the pipelining enabled and this report doesn&#8217;t do so. For the man to crow &#8220;I love this feature, and use it to it&#8217;s fullest&#8221; without quantifying what difference it makes, sounds like snake oil salesmanship to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarryW</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>BarryW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>Just moved from FF 2.0.0.14 to 3.0 RC1 - it's very fast even without the pipelining tweak.

Enabled pipelining and works very well with most websites except banking sites it seems.

Suggest you try logging into your bank account with pipelining enabled to see what happens.

My bank site jams up with pipelining enabled so I've gone back to the default mode.

The rendering speed of FF 3.0 should help the speed freaks - currently 10x faster than IE7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just moved from FF 2.0.0.14 to 3.0 RC1 - it&#8217;s very fast even without the pipelining tweak.</p>
<p>Enabled pipelining and works very well with most websites except banking sites it seems.</p>
<p>Suggest you try logging into your bank account with pipelining enabled to see what happens.</p>
<p>My bank site jams up with pipelining enabled so I&#8217;ve gone back to the default mode.</p>
<p>The rendering speed of FF 3.0 should help the speed freaks - currently 10x faster than IE7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inhahe</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1859</link>
		<dc:creator>inhahe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1859</guid>
		<description>Pipelining isn't about opening multiple simultaneous connections to the webserver; it's about sending multiple requests in a single connection (and possibly even a single packet) without waiting for response for each one.  

The frustrating thing is that it's hardly ever used because *some* webservers  which pretend to support HTTP 1.1 don't support pipelining, even though they're *required* to according to the HTTP 1.1 spec (browsers aren't required to, only servers), and since it's supposed to be assumed that they support it, there's no good way to tell whether one does or not, so browsers like FireFox tend to play it safe and a) disable pipelining by default, and b) use heuristics to determine whether to use it when it's enabled.

Wikipedia says that most webservers support it, and as the only exceptions lists a couple of versions of IIS.  So I'm thinking maybe we can thank Microsoft for doing things their own way as usual - whatever's convenient for them - thus preventing web browsing from becoming much faster and more efficient for everyone.

I suppose it would have been better if they had anticipated that some people (like Microsoft) would screw it up and made pipelining optional and included a spec to indicate whether it's supported in the http header.  But I guess hindsight's 20/20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pipelining isn&#8217;t about opening multiple simultaneous connections to the webserver; it&#8217;s about sending multiple requests in a single connection (and possibly even a single packet) without waiting for response for each one.  </p>
<p>The frustrating thing is that it&#8217;s hardly ever used because *some* webservers  which pretend to support HTTP 1.1 don&#8217;t support pipelining, even though they&#8217;re *required* to according to the HTTP 1.1 spec (browsers aren&#8217;t required to, only servers), and since it&#8217;s supposed to be assumed that they support it, there&#8217;s no good way to tell whether one does or not, so browsers like FireFox tend to play it safe and a) disable pipelining by default, and b) use heuristics to determine whether to use it when it&#8217;s enabled.</p>
<p>Wikipedia says that most webservers support it, and as the only exceptions lists a couple of versions of IIS.  So I&#8217;m thinking maybe we can thank Microsoft for doing things their own way as usual - whatever&#8217;s convenient for them - thus preventing web browsing from becoming much faster and more efficient for everyone.</p>
<p>I suppose it would have been better if they had anticipated that some people (like Microsoft) would screw it up and made pipelining optional and included a spec to indicate whether it&#8217;s supported in the http header.  But I guess hindsight&#8217;s 20/20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navegadors (I) default &#171; Ubunmaqueando</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1857</link>
		<dc:creator>Navegadors (I) default &#171; Ubunmaqueando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/05/25/the-truth-about-the-firefox-pipelining-trick/#comment-1857</guid>
		<description>[...] servidor web d&#8217;on prové ho permet, clar!) &#8230; però a vegades la cosa pot complicar-se. Aqui trobareu una petita explicació [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] servidor web d&#8217;on prové ho permet, clar!) &#8230; però a vegades la cosa pot complicar-se. Aqui trobareu una petita explicació [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
