<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WinSplit Revolution &#8211; Get The Most Out Of Your Monitor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://egonitron.com/2007/08/24/winsplit-revolution-get-the-most-out-of-your-monitor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/08/24/winsplit-revolution-get-the-most-out-of-your-monitor/</link>
	<description>Helping Geeks Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: egon</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/08/24/winsplit-revolution-get-the-most-out-of-your-monitor/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>egon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/08/24/winsplit-revolution-get-the-most-out-of-your-monitor/#comment-836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ian, I assume you&#039;re talking about Windows&#039; built-in Tile Windows function? The main difference is WinSplit is much more functional, in that it let&#039;s you have much more control over exactly how you want your windows to tile. It&#039;s also much faster, especially when you&#039;re wanting a more complex set-up, and is compatible with dual-monitors. It does also throw in a few more features like Windows Fusion, Automatic Placement, and Mosaic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, I assume you&#8217;re talking about Windows&#8217; built-in Tile Windows function? The main difference is WinSplit is much more functional, in that it let&#8217;s you have much more control over exactly how you want your windows to tile. It&#8217;s also much faster, especially when you&#8217;re wanting a more complex set-up, and is compatible with dual-monitors. It does also throw in a few more features like Windows Fusion, Automatic Placement, and Mosaic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iantrepreneur</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2007/08/24/winsplit-revolution-get-the-most-out-of-your-monitor/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Iantrepreneur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 19:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2007/08/24/winsplit-revolution-get-the-most-out-of-your-monitor/#comment-835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that is a great tool I have dual monitors right now and I think I am using it perfectly but would be the difference if you just tile your windows? its similar to winsplit in a way unless there are other features that are totally different]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is a great tool I have dual monitors right now and I think I am using it perfectly but would be the difference if you just tile your windows? its similar to winsplit in a way unless there are other features that are totally different</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 229/231 objects using memcached

 Served from: egonitron.com @ 2013-05-24 14:57:46 by W3 Total Cache -->