<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Don&#8217;t Web Hosts Offer Automatic Fail-over?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://egonitron.com/2008/02/17/webhosts-failover-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://egonitron.com/2008/02/17/webhosts-failover-coverage/</link>
	<description>Helping Geeks Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 45n5</title>
		<link>http://egonitron.com/2008/02/17/webhosts-failover-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>45n5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egonitron.com/2008/02/17/webhosts-failover-coverage/#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>you would think that this problem of keeping a site up 100% of the time or at least degrading nicely would have been solved in 1996, especially when a solution is rather simple

but it hasn&#039;t.  seems like a good opportunity for a host to step up to the plate and try and make a difference.

thanks for the mention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you would think that this problem of keeping a site up 100% of the time or at least degrading nicely would have been solved in 1996, especially when a solution is rather simple</p>
<p>but it hasn&#8217;t.  seems like a good opportunity for a host to step up to the plate and try and make a difference.</p>
<p>thanks for the mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 187/199 objects using memcached

Served from: egonitron.com @ 2012-05-17 08:19:53 -->
